| By
MIKE MOORE |
November 2004 |
FORGIVENESS
OF DEBT?
I recently
spent some splendid time as a guest of the World Political Forum,
the brainchild of ex-Soviet leader, Gorbachev, which brought together
a number of major players from the 1980s.
Remember
sunglass-wearing Polish General Jaruzelski, who made one of the
most fateful phone calls in history, telling Gorbachev the election
was a landslide loss? Gorbachev changed the world by saying, accept
the result. Jaruzelski complained that bureaucracy in Poland
had tripled. Curious point to make by an ex-Communist leader, I
thought.
I felt
like I was a visitor locked in a newsreel of the 80s,
what was I doing with these aging, fading, balding, overweight heroes
and villains? Then I saw my reflection in the mirrored hall. I understood.
I, too, have a great future behind me. Gorbachev is a truly historic
figure. He changed the world, one of the best known people in the
world, respected, admired everywhere but Russia. His place in history
is assured, but with all politicians thats never enough. Now
he has assembled a star line-up to address the major issue facing
the world. Poverty; despair, humiliation, desperation, and the evil
it does to individuals makes it the breeding ground for violence,
true throughout history. The world has got better since Gorbachev
was Soviet leader, Eastern and Central Europe is mainly free, Latin
America once completely dominated by dictators is now democratic
except for Cuba. Life expectancy has gone up by 20 years, and infant
mortality down by 2/3rds. Literacy has exploded. However there are
clear exceptions despite much progress. There are unacceptable irregularities
and injustices. The top 225 rich individuals have a total wealth
equal to over half the worlds population. That means each
of them have assets equal to the wages of 30 million people. Four
and a half billion people live on less than a dollar a day, 30,000
to 50,000 people die every day due to malnutrition, lack of access
to clean water and health services. For 15 years, per capita GDP
and annual income per inhabitant have decreased sharply in 54 countries,
which together account for 12% of the worlds population. 30
years ago, per capita income of sub-Saharan Africa was 1/6th of
that of OECD countries, while today that ratio is 1/40.
Debt
hangs around poor countries necks like a noose. Much of this
money was lent during the cold war to prop up gangsters and criminals,
total developing country debt is nearly $3,000 billion. Should a
newly democratic country like Kenya, Nigeria, even Brazil and Argentine,
pay for commitments made by others? Vietnam actually honoured debts
and loans made by the government they overthrew after a devastating
war. This raises an interesting question about debts in places like
Iraq. The great economist, John Maynard Keynes, stormed out of the
Versailles Conference in 1919 to write his pamphlet warning of the
economic consequences of peace, saying Vengeance I dare predict
will not limp Perhaps we have learnt, in 1876 the French and
British seized Egypt to force loan repayments, and German, Italian
and British warships shelled Venezuelan ports to force loan payments
in 1902. Programmes to reschedule and cancel loans have been on
the global agenda for a decade.
A hated
word among aid agencies is conditionality. That is,
rules and agreements as to how extra income is used. I disagree.
If properly done through transparent trusts to manage grants and
new incomes, this could satisfy both sides. No more excuses either
from the West.
What
else to do? The economies that have done the best are those that
have introduced open trading systems, accountable politicians, professional,
honest public service, clean tax, customs, police services, independent
courts, and property rights. No two democracies have ever gone to
war, and there has never been a famine in a democratic country.
The wealthy countries need to live up to their own promises. Development
aid, despite promises for a generation of .7% of GDP, has actually
dropped. Opening agriculture trade would mean 5 times more for Africa
than present aid donated by governments. Remember the U.N. Millennium
Conference, when over 100 world leaders promised to halve poverty
by the year 2015? At present progress it will take another 150 years
to reach that noble target. The world is now so integrated, information
so instantaneous, borders so porous, that everyone, everywhere,
will pay a terrible price as desperate people seek desperate solutions
if we fail. And failing we are. The time-bomb ticks, it can be defused. |