
EU
dream proves a nightmare
| By
MIKE MOORE |
23
June 2004 |
It was touted as Europe's biggest exercise in democracy, the second-largest
ballot after parliamentary elections in India. The elections to the
European parliament gave 350million voters in 25 nations the opportunity
to elect a representative assembly. This in itself is a unique historic
experiment, and it comes just a week before European leaders are to
meet in Brussels to seek a consensus on a constitutional treaty.
Direct
elections were seen to be the democratic glue that would bind together
the new, enlarged EU. The result stunned the establishment: a message
of anger and apathy was sent to EU governments. Fifty-five per cent
of the people did not vote. Sitting governments everywhere were
punished. The German Social Democrats got the lowest vote since
the war; French President Jacques Chirac's centre-right movement
in France could muster only 17per cent support, compared with the
socialists' 29per cent. The leftist opposition moved forward in
Italy, and Tony Blair's Labour Party was hammered.
Local
elections were held in the UK simultaneously, and Blair's Labour
came third, its worst result in almost 90 years.
But
while the Conservatives won the most seats in Britain, a new party,
the UK Independence Party, which calls for immediate British withdrawal
from the EU, got over 20per cent of the vote. This win was mainly
at the expense of the Conservatives, who are seen to be too moderate
on Europe by many of their supporters. Watch the UK Tories become
more anti-Europe.
The
European struggle is mainly between the federalists, who are perceived
to want a United States of Europe, and those nationalists who want
a United Nations of Europe. The voter turnout in those enthusiastic
new EU members, Poland and other ex-communist east European states,
was less than 38 per cent. Many voted in extreme-nationalist, anti-EU
candidates.
Europe
has been a dangerous place for centuries. Its civil wars have dragged
the world into global conflict twice in a century, with real wars
and a costly Cold War. Now the Soviet Union has gone (a historic
anomaly that will puzzle scholars for centuries), there is a wider,
more hopeful, prosperous Europe.
During
the Cold War taxpayers could put up with a costly bureaucracy in
Europe. Now that Europe comprises 25 countries, there will be greater
scrutiny of the EU's powers. In Holland, a video from the new Transparent
Europe Party revealing MPs' perks and dubious expenses provoked
anger and even more cynicism among voters. From the IRA's political
wing, Sinn Fein, to Poland's self-defence party, there are now more
than 90 of the 723 Euro MPs who are passionately anti-Europe. One
of them, a British TV talk-show host, Robert Kilroy-Silk, who is
supported by the former Dynasty actress Joan Collins, has said he
is going to Brussels to wreck it. Will this be a permanent feature
of European politics? Perhaps it will evolve into a states-versus-federal
power argument, which has been central to US politics since the
American union was created.
Maybe
it's a healthy wake-up call. Voters in continental Europe endure
slow growth and high unemployment, but the same voters hate the
policies that could correct these problems - attacking bloated welfare
systems and bureaucracies and costly protectionist policies.
Public
opinion polls have revealed a summit fatigue, and disillusionment
with the endless leaders' conferences - not with the issues such
conferences are concerned about, namely education, health, employment,
and law and order.
Leaders
love the international photo opportunities, but so concerned was
Tony Blair with this perception that he explained most of his time
was spent on local issues, not the world stage.
Perhaps
this is a lesson for leaders like Australian Prime Minister John
Howard and New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clarke, who face elections
shortly. All politics is local. Given a choice, constituents would
rather have a new school than their leaders receive a Nobel Prize. |