
Winning the peace is the key
| By
MIKE MOORE |
25
March 2003 |
For
months, people have been discussing a war with Iraq. The fact that
there is a war is a failure of diplomacy and the institutions created
to keep the peace. Alas, history has taught us that sometimes it
comes down to direct action when you are not dealing with sane or
rational people.
In
Australia and New Zealand, we are not accustomed to dealing with
evil and corrupt people. It's beyond our moral compass.
But
the question has always been, OK, once the war is won, then what?
Good
question. Peacemaking - creating a grim peace by force - has worked
in the past. Peacekeeping - that is, keeping hostile groups and
tribes apart - has a more rocky record. Nation building - putting
the pieces together to create a functioning political unit - is
very costly and difficult.
One
of the most successful examples of peacekeeping and nation building
was the Marshall plan, instituted in 1947 to rebuild Europe. The
Marshall plan did not work because of the money involved (in terms
of government expenditure it was very little). It worked because
it created certainty.
It
set an ambitious and principled precedent. The Europeans wanted
democracy and open markets and societies. Old institutions, political
parties, trade unions, chambers of commerce, civil society were
there, eager to start again.
Never
in the history of mankind has anyone washed a rental car. Ownership
is the key to success. That's why smart people in Washington, Europe
and at the United Nations are planning for a post-Saddam Hussein
Iraq that helps recreate what was one of the most successful societies
in the Middle East.
The
strategy is to have the armed forces seen as liberators, not occupiers.
Failure here will have a dangerous, destabilising effect.
The
war is not about oil. If it was, the UN could have lifted the embargo.
But to many in the region, that's how it has been sold.
British
Prime Minister Tony Blair has suggested an initial trust fund be
established to distribute resources. Winning the war may be the
easy part; winning and securing the peace is the more expensive
and difficult part. There are no Thomas Jeffersons or Benjamin Franklins
waiting to take over.
What
is needed is a good central bank, secular educationalists, honest
courts, people with the skills to handle post-war demands for compensation
and justice. Accountable representative leaders and an even-handed
civil service will be central to long-term success.
Handling
public relations within the Arab world and maintaining a coalition
of the willing to mobilise global public opinion - not now to march
for peace but to pay for and maintain that peace, working with UN
agencies and NGOs - will be a difficult political challenge.
Iraq's
various faiths, factions and tribes need to be given an early road
map so that they can again own their nation. This is possible and
vital to long-term success. Iraq is not Afghanistan, but it's not
East Timor or Kosovo either.
It's
a sign of mature hope that the post-war strategy is receiving as
much attention as the planning for a war. Another sign of hope was
a story in The Independent newspaper on March 12 which reported,
"Facing an impending war and an infrastructure fractured by
years of sanctions, the financial heart of Iraq's capital should
have long stopped. But the stock index had risen by 58 per cent
to 2,117 in the past six months. And it's not just shares and stocks
that are rocketing. Baghdad, Bastra and Mosqul have become some
of the prime spots in the region for real estate. The price of land
has risen by 20 per cent in the past four months."
The
market is speaking. Investors are already factoring in regime change
and a lifting of sanctions. There is a possibility of great and
good things. Just imagine how much easier it would have been if
Hussein had accepted UN resolutions, or if the resolutions had not
been necessary.
I've
visited Iraq, and most developing countries and economies in transition.
There is just no reason for people to be poor. It is the corrupt,
homicidal leaders, bureaucrats, tribal leaders and phony capitalists
who inflict war and poverty on people. |