| By
MIKE MOORE |
20 September 2005 |
WHO
WILL WIN ?
Nobody
won the election in New Zealand, yet. To understand whats
happening needs an understanding of New Zealands electoral
system which is no longer based on the British Parliamentary system,
but is M.M.P., mixed member proportional representation. Half the
Members of Parliament are directly elected, the other half represent
the party based on the party vote. People get two votes, one for
their local Member of Parliament, another for the party - thats
the vote that determines the number each party has in Parliament.
M.M.P. was introduced into Germany after the war, its purpose was
to ensure no single party can easily govern on its own, there must
be coalitions. At present, Labour has 40.74% of the vote, National
39.63%. Thus Labour has one more seat. The other parties in Parliament
are New Zealand First, lead by Winston Peters with 7 seats and 5.84%;
the Greens with 5.7% - 6 seats; United Future - 3 seats; ACT with
2 seats; Progressive with 1 seat, and the Maori Party with 4 seats.
There is a 5% threshold to get list seats, but if an electorate
seat is won, that does not apply. 10% of the vote is still to be
counted, these are special and overseas votes that will take a few
weeks to sort out and normally favour National. The Greens could
drop below the 5% threshold necessary to be in Parliament if the
student vote swung to Labour because of its promise to abolish interest
on student loans.
Winston
Peters of New Zealand First, and Peter Dunne of United Future have
said they would talk first to the party with the most votes, sounds
good for Labour but get this - both have said they would find it
hard to work with the Greens. The Greens expect Cabinet seats this
time after being loyal supporters of the Clark Labour Government
for the past 6 years. This will be a frail coalition, vulnerable,
you have to give Labour a 60% chance of forming a government but
you would be brave to think the Government could survive a full
3-year term. Labour took a pounding in its Maori electoral base,
with the new Maori Party taking 4 of the Maori seats. On the face
of it, they would support Labour before National on votes of confidence.
They will want to open up controversial seabed legislation and have
said they would rather have a new election than sell out. This position
is in direct conflict to the bottom lines other minority party leaders
have taken. Helen Clark has proven adept in her handling of these
conflicting positions in the past.
Now
what happened? National almost increased its vote by 50%, its 65-year
old novice leader, Don Brash, cruelly nick-named Mogadon
because of his grey, even boring style, became rather attractive
because many New Zealanders are angry and alienated by what they
see as politically correct busy-body socialism. There are two New
Zealands, it was an election of two halves. The conservatives
swept provincial rural and regional New Zealand, then saw the tide
stop, even reverse, in the great urban centres. National did determine
the agenda, offering massive tax cuts. Labour, after saying the
country could afford them, almost matched them. It was almost as
though each campaign committee sat and thought, Whatever it
takes. Labour offered 250 new policemen, National 1,000, then
Winston Peters said 5,000. It was an election where nobody asked
where the money was coming from, the media and public convinced
New Zealands surplus was permanent and could be spent several
times. Labour had a good story to tell, lowest unemployment in the
OECD, good growth, massive if frequently misspent expenditure in
health and education.
But
the issue which hit home the most and will dominate and determine
the shape of the Government and the shape of our society, will be
issues Maori. If the first-ever Maori Party sits in Parliament determined
to extract evermore concessions, then polarisation is inevitable,
the cracks can be papered over with taxpayers money for a
few more years yet. But this is changing New Zealand. Unless there
is a new consensus, I fear for my party, my Labour tribe, and I
fear for my country. |