| By
MIKE MOORE |
29 March 2006 |
THE
RETURN OF THE MAGINOT LINE
Im
on the board of a European company that met in London recently,
while there I met with senior Government advisors, labour M.P.s
and with a surprisingly liberal conservative M.P. I dont know
whether to be insulted or pleased that my writings are of interest
to U.K. Tories.
The
big issue raised was, "Why has Europe lost its nerve?"
With the non vote beating off the misunderstood European Constitution,
it was a safe bet that the pause button would be pressed,
but now politicians have pushed the rewind button. Despite
the core difference of politicians who on one side seek a vision
of a more federal Europe, and those who just see the European Commission
as an inter-governmental agency, a mini U.N. of Europe, all seemed
to accept the proposition that a wider, open European economic zone
was a good idea. To argue otherwise would be to suggest the United
Kingdom would be stronger if England, Wales and Scotland had separate
tax, investment, tariff and customs regimes, or if the U.S. had
50 different states managing individual economic regimes. Two world
wars concentrated the minds of a generation so the wider European
project has been a force for good inside Europe and a useful global
partner outside Europe. An integrated Europe, we hoped, had buried
the demons of nationalism. It was that economic nationalism, "beggar
your neighbour", that had prolonged and deepened the Great
Depression, and gave rise to those twin European tyrannies, Fascism
and Marxism. The fall of communism and globalisation has given new
life to nationalism. We ought to remind ourselves that while history
shows that man has always travelled, traded ideas and products,
and globalised, there have been setbacks. Why now? When the last
50 years have seen the greatest, most sustained lifting of living
standards in human history? The process will not be stopped but
it can be stalled ....... Burma, North Korea, Zimbabwe are extreme
examples of nations that have closed off their societies and economies.
The process stopped during the Cold War, and as many European headlines
reminded us recently, in August 1914. Thats when globalisation
was stopped in its tracks, passports introduced and people no longer
could transfer money or invest easily across borders. Europe has
stalled. Germany and France, two of the great economies, missed
the reforms of the 80s that many countries went through.
Productivity lags behind her competitors, welfare, and taxes are
higher, unemployment higher, holidays longer, research, investment
lower, the population aging rapidly, if you believe in statistics,
there will be no Italians in 150 years.
Many
continental leaders are now just reacting. Globalisation, said the
French President, is as bad as communism. Immigration, that powerful
generator of wealth, is not popular, Christian Europe is reeling
from what it sees as an Islamic wave which they fear threatens their
social cohesion, and from China and India which they say threatens
their economies. Politicians fear the impact of new European members
from East and Central Europe, let alone Turkey. Protectionism is
on the rise, not just against pressures from outside Europe but
from inside. A job-creating European services strategy once agreed
has now been rejected, big players have cynically missed agreed
deficit targets.
Spanish
politicians are trying to block German investment in its energy
sector, Poland wants to block a European-driven banking merger,
scandals erupted in Italy as bankers tried to block takeovers. France
talks of economic patriotism and protecting the commanding heights
of its economy with Ministers directing the state to increase its
shareholdings in sensitive companies and "advising" companies
to merge to beat off Italian investors-invaders. Many European governments
held hands to try and stop London-based Indian, Mittal Steel, from
buying up European steel companies. None of this is new historically
and its never worked before. One definition of political and
economic insanity is when leaders do the same thing, time and time
again, and expect different results.
Far
from saving Europe from the new competition of China and India,
these restrictive, inward-looking policies will make Europe less
productive, less competitive, and more reliant on taxpayers handouts,
which guarantees eventual failure. Populist protectionist sentiment
in the U.S. is also gathering force, all this is evermore reason
to go for the big ambitious Doha Trade Deal.
If
it gets too hard locally and politicians create economic Maginot
Lines to pretend to protect constituents, then the very smart ones
know the easiest way out is reforms through the World Trade Organisation
negotiations and then they can blame the WTO for helping them do
what they should have done anyway. |