| By
MIKE MOORE |
17 October 2006 |
MUHAMMAD
YUNUS - MICRO CREDIT
Three
cheers for the Nobel Committee awarding its Peace Prize to Bangladeshi
economist, Muhammad Yunus, for his pioneering, on-the-ground success
by inventing the idea of micro-credit and that has assisted millions.
Yunus was a pro-independence Bangladeshi student in the United States
when Bangladesh became independent. He returned home flush with
nationalistic patriotism and keen to contribute to the development
of his homeland. It was a time after the collapse of colonialism
when it was natural for enthusiastic nationalistic new governments
to look beyond their past masters policies and seek brave
new models to emulate. Russia had leap-frogged from a wretched,
feudal society to leading the space race personified by Sputnik.
That
attracted many to the Russian model of development. Yunus, working
for his government, became disgusted with economic planners and
their failures, earlier than most, and left safe government service
to return to university life. Perhaps he read about the Soviet economist,
visiting London in the 1970s who demanded to meet whoever
was in charge of bread production, and was confused to be told,
No-one. Noticing that local fields lie idle and unproductive
for several seasons during the devastating 1974 famine, he realised
he could multiply productivity with a small water pump. The cost
was so small, no bank was interested. The transaction costs too
high to bother, and the people who needed the pump had no money
or assets to borrow against. From this simple realisation, he established
the Grameen Bank - Grameen means village
or rural in Bangladesh. His first loan was from his
own pocket, US$27.00, shared among 42 people for weaving stools.
His bank has lent out US$5.72 billion, 98.5% is repaid, 96% goes
to women, and most loans are under $100.
The
borrowers own 94% of the Bank and the Government, 6%. Such small
sums elbows out corrupt bureaucrats, and politicians are sidelined,
they love to announce think big projects, not small
stuff which is not newsworthy.
Its
a big idea that works.
Another
big idea that should be read by every business person, bureaucrat,
and politician, is explained in C.K. Prahalads remarkable
book entitled The Fortune At The Bottom of The Pyramid,
on how to eradicate poverty through profits. He looks at purchasing
power parity - and finds India, China, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia,
Turkey, South Africa combined have a GDP of over $12 trillion, larger
than Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and France. Then he studies companies
that are tapping the bottom of this market, lifting living standards
and providing jobs and consumers with a better deal. The poor are
price-sensitive, ambitious, canny, and welcome technology. Cell
phones are growing at 1.5 million a month in India which now has
more than China. Brazil already has 35-40 million. New low cost
PC kiosks are liberating villagers in many countries. Internet connectivity
increases poor farmers and fishermens incomes by 5-10%.
Big global brands, who meet the needs of the very poor can make
good profits. Avon has 800,000 ladies managing distribution in Brazil
alone, Amway, in India has 600,000 representatives running their
own little businesses. 4 billion people who have the opportunity
of becoming consumers represents a profound change in the global
economy.
The
third big idea in this trifecta is that Governments still matter,
especially the quality and professionalism of the civil service.
Hernando De Soto, who should get the next Nobel Prize, is a Peruvian
economist and his splendid work on why capitalism works in some
countries and not others, offers another profound insight. Poor
countries have enormous assets but lack capital. Those assets cannot
be unlocked because of poor legal titles, assets cannot be bought,
sold or borrowed against. Mexico, De Soto claims, has $300 billion
of trapped resources, and to work within the existing system in
places like Egypt where to purchase land you have to go to over
30 agencies and navigate 70 procedures, means people are smarter
to work in the black economy, which produces two-thirds of the jobs
in poor countries.
Legalising
peoples properties which they already own, allowing them access
to credit, providing services through markets, has worked for the
rich countries - why not poor countries? The legal empowerment of
the poor, through democracy, property rights, access to credit,
access to courts, access to information, the ability to organise
in a civil society, open trade - these are the opportunities that,
when available to people, take nations out of extreme poverty. Theres
a United Nations Commission working on this very agenda now, I am
its least distinguished member. |